25. Vaccine passports – no health/biological justification
Vaccine passports are not capable of controlling transmission for at least 5 biological reasons:
As already explained, unvaccinated individuals with no symptoms cannot spread disease. The vaccination status of these people is therefore irrelevant.
Vaccinated people with no outward symptoms can be very good silent spreaders as discussed. They should therefore, arguably, not be permitted in crowded areas without a test.
A person with symptoms, whether vaccinated or not, can however transmit the virus. It is now accepted that so called breakthrough cases occur very commonly in the vaccinated. The CDC has confirmed that vaccinees have at least as much viral load in their nasal passages as the unvaccinated. A study from Oxford University found that vaccinees had 251-1,000 x the delta viral load in their nasal passages as the previously unvaccinated. The double vaccinees are the real super spreaders, not the unvaccinated, and this is borne out by our own observations. On this basis, it is certainly not the double vaccinated that should have the passports. Using similar logic, a vaccinated person with symptoms should therefore not be allowed into crowded spaces.
We have noticed that double vaccinated parents have been getting ill and passing this on to their unvaccinated children (although that could also be the result of spike transmission). However, the children from unvaccinated families have not been sick. This is anecdotal of course but this phenomenon has been quite noticeable around us.
Whether someone gets infected is NOT just dependent on whether someone else nearby is transmitting the virus. It is far more dependent on the state of the immune system of the person themselves (as is the likelihood of developing Long Covid). If they are healthy with a well-functioning immune system supported by optimal vitamin D + Mg, the virus is unlikely to get past their mucosal and innate defences and they are highly unlikely to get sick and therefore transmit the virus.
Unvaccinated people who have had Covid have robust long lasting variant proof immunity and also have mucosal immunity which make them extremely unlikely to become transmitters or to ever get infected again. Data from Israel shows that the double vaccinated have 27x the risk of having symptomatic Covid and 8x the risk of dying compared to the unvaccinated Covid recovered. If only one category of people should have a vaccine passport, logically it should be the Covid recovered.
For these multiple reasons, the idea of passports for the vaccinated as a measure to control the spread of the virus is beyond irrational and certainly not based on science or real-world data. This is, of course, before considering all the moral, ethical and legal issues which are equally, if not even more, important.
26. Vaccine passports - an alternative rationale and stark warning
The authorities cannot be so incompetent that they do not know all this, so what might be the actual reason for this very strong and unwavering juggernaut-like push towards vaccine passports? And why have many other previously free advanced nations already adopted them? A plausible reason might be to coerce more people to take the hugely profitable vaccines despite the inevitability of this being disastrous for the health of the population. Another reason is to increase control over every person as warned by commentators from the beginning of 2020. One detailed warning of what was planned for us all that particularly caught my attention was an account written in November 2020 by Sebastian Friebel, ex advisor to the German Bundestag. Vaccine passports represent a very steeply inclined and highly dangerous slippery slope which will enable them to transform into digital biometric IDs tied to Central Bank Digital Currency used to control other aspects, and perhaps every aspect, of life. There is plenty of evidence that the tech platforms used have been designed to extend to a number of other intrusive areas and that certain supranational organisations have documented plans, which they make no attempt to hide, to implement just such a dystopian control system. There is evidence that this is what has been planned all along, and that the virus was a profitable and integral means of achieving this goal and maintaining it- it is far easier to take freedoms away from people when they are terrified to death of a virus, which they would never in a million years give up willingly under normal circumstances. By the time most people realise what has been taken away from them under the guise of a pandemic, it might already be too late.
What might be taken away? Well, many things: freedom to exercise free will and go where you want when you want; the right to true health instead of the state’s definition of health; the right to free speech; the right to own property and other assets; the right not to be injected with whatever the state thinks fit at any time; the right not to have your hard-earned wealth removed at a whim; the right to eat what you wish; the right to family life; the right not to be restrained or detained without due process and the proper rule of law; the right to democracy itself – the most valued and cherished rights of western individuals and societies which have been hard won by the sacrifice and spilt blood of our ancestors over many generations. I hope that by the time you read this, the door has not already closed, and passive resistance is still a possibility.
We should all become familiar with the concepts of gaslighting, manipulation and coercive control and with the minds of psychopaths who are capable of the most unbelievable behaviour because they do not possess even a shred of empathy or remorse. This makes them very different to the vast majority of us who possess empathy although it is sometimes difficult to spot them because they know exactly how to behave in public and are often terribly charming. They will do and say whatever they need to, including murdering or injuring any number of people in order to achieve their aims. This really does not bother them in the slightest as they have no feelings for fellow humans. Only self-preservation and the prospect of getting caught and punished are deterrents to them. Such people often rise to the top of organisations and governments. There are many such people in the world and it appears that some of these powerful people, aided by supranational bodies they control and puppet governments, collectively wish to control the rest of us and severely restrict our freedom. Please take a look at the last video on this page at the Chinese Social Credit System, the model planned for the rest of the world.
From around June 2020, I started recognising psychological techniques being used on the British public by our own government and advisors. Nudging behaviour by the government might be acceptable if well-intentioned and benign but is very far removed from gaslighting when the public is made to believe things which are, in most cases, the exact opposite of the truth, and subjected to coercion so overt that it amounts to bullying and blackmail. I am afraid that this is exactly what we have all been subjected to. This sort of behaviour is criminalised within a domestic setting but is it acceptable when used by our own government against us? The justification that a worldwide pandemic makes it excusable is extremely weak once it is realised that there was no such dangerous pandemic to begin with and that the few experts steering the ship must also have known this. Everything that was done seems to have been done with a specific agenda in mind which included vaccinating the entire planet.
People who had reason to question the narrative early on and/or who do not watch TV were insulated from the effects of this gaslighting and manipulation and continued looking behind the official narratives at the data, scientific research and information from independent non conflicted trusted sources. They travelled in an entirely different direction and started living in a parallel alternative reality to the majority. Last summer I resigned as a member of the Conservative Party after concluding that what they were doing was so irrational that those governing us must be controlled by external forces and no longer stood for the traditional conservative values I believed in. I also cancelled our long-standing subscription to The Times, having grown increasingly exasperated at the one sided and scientifically inaccurate coverage.
Under the guise of a pandemic, Emergency Legislation has been enacted under which 90+ new draconian laws have been pushed through without parliamentary scrutiny or debate, giving the Government excessive control and removing all manner of rights and safeguards from citizens on various pretexts.
The World Health Organization recently released a guiding document for a digital vaccine certificate that will be blockchain based. This is to be used to implement a vaccine passport in every country and is funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation & Rockefeller Foundation.
This Final Warning to Humanity from Dr Yeadon, recorded some months ago, is essential viewing from 39.40 to 50.30 minutes. (The rest is also well worth watching.)
Whatever your views are now on vaccination we all need to come together and unite to strongly resist such a nightmare-like future, if not for our own sakes then for the sake of our children and our children’s children as warned. Those were the same words I wrote to my MP in September 2020. This has been a silent war fought with propaganda and disinformation against the entire world. It is incredibly effective as the attacked do not even realise they are under attack and even if they are told, they still don’t believe it. But there are no white horses, no Allied Forces or any 007 to save us. We have to save ourselves by passively resisting participation in anything to do with vaccine passports. Only by sufficient numbers of people realising what is happening and simply refusing to participate, including members of the police and forces, might we stand a good chance of preventing this dystopian future from becoming our reality.
27. Can this really be happening?
If everything outlined above were true then doesn’t that mean key experts including the JCVI knew or ought to have known that recommended treatments would cause thousands of deaths? Not necessarily at all. There is evidence that the US FDA did indeed know back in October 2020 prior to authorising emergency use as they presented a slide showing dozens of known potential adverse events. However, only a few key experts needed to ‘know’ in each country. Although we can be sure that key people of influence in politics, at the head of medical bodies, unions etc are under the influence of the perpetrators of this crime, the remainder would only need to be presented with biased/misrepresented information, be subjected to repeat messaging by the media, subjected to bribes, enticements, manipulation, threats and subtle blackmail techniques.
Immunology and molecular biology can be incredibly complex areas. Researchers often spend years looking at very narrow areas of subject matter and often do not necessarily have detailed knowledge of other areas. Most experts, including doctors, have only a very cursory knowledge of immunology which does not enable them to question what they are told. Many professionals are busy people and would have taken the vaccine trial data at face value instead of digging further, especially as they were presented with a solution to what they thought was a dreadfully dangerous pandemic that would kill many people. There is also the issue of groupthink and not wishing to be an outlier. Experts and the medical profession are just as vulnerable to coercive control and manipulation as the rest of the public. For the vast majority, their jobs and livelihoods are dependent on compliance, and so even if they are not deceived, they will often not have the courage to step out of line. For instance, doctors in several countries have been sent letters from their medical bodies warning them of disciplinary action and loss of certification should they step out of line. Most members of the JCVI had no motive to question in detail all information they received and would have taken much of it in good faith.
Government leaders reacted in a similar way to others all around the world, using exactly the same terminology and language as if they themselves were controlled and coordinated in some way. Robert Kennedy outlines the means by which governments have been persuaded to react in this coordinated fashion. Starting in Jan/Feb 2020, I have watched many hours of video footage of some of the many simulations he refers to. In the US Dr Fauci was clearly the driving force. In the UK there are probably at least a few key experts driving decision making.
28. Who can we believe?
As explained, fact checkers, MSM and others will attempt to smear and discredit anyone with a different view. But consider this: who is more likely to be telling you the truth? Is it people who have conflicts of interest, who stand to gain financially, whose jobs or research funding depend on staying in line or who have participated and are fully invested in the entire operation? Is it governments that will be terrified of public anger should they discover the extent to which governments have been complicit in furthering the interests of industry at the expense of the population? Or is it experts, scientists and doctors who are at the very top of their fields of expertise with multiple degrees, PhDs and other credentials from the world’s top universities, Nobel Prize winning scientists, the inventor of the mRNA vaccine technology itself, who stand to lose everything including their jobs, their reputation and money but feel they have a duty to their fellow human beings to warn them about something so wrong and consequential that they are willing to sacrifice all those things? These are the people you will hear from if you have watched the material linked in this document. And bear in mind that these people still continue shouting, if not from the rooftops, from every limited platform they can still manage to get on, despite barriers, ostracization, threats, loss of income and persistent attempts to sue, intimidate and silence them. Ask yourself: why will they still not just give up from desperately trying to warn others and trying to stop what is happening, despite considerable costs to themselves? Can they really all be that mad or deranged, or mistaken? They certainly do not sound as if they are any of those things to me. To me they sound like very principled, highly intelligent people for whom scientific integrity, truth, justice and empathy for fellow human beings are very important.
Look around you and ask yourself whether there have been far more ‘health conditions’ including returning cancers and unexpected deaths in people you personally know since the commencement of the vaccine programme. Where deaths of people you know may have been labelled as Covid deaths, had these people in fact been vaccinated? Were the deaths really caused by Covid or now that you know the mechanisms involved, could they have been caused by ADE, the injection or something else entirely? Are you now seeing lots of cases of infections, including Covid, in fully vaccinated people? Is it time we started believing our own eyes rather than what we are fed via our TV by those who do not have our best interests at heart?
If you do not wish to continue being fed propaganda by your TV and papers you can access fully researched and refenced truthful free news from UK Column, broadcast 3 days a week but available to watch at any time. Their members have grown exponentially since the start of the ‘pandemic’ as more and more people come to realise that we are being grossly misled.
29. Legal Action
In addition to the many legal cases already noted here, there have been a number of other victories, such as a Spanish ruling that lockdowns and restrictions are unlawful, but governments continue to ignore all of these. They appear to be operating above the law in many cases. Many legal actions have been filed with many more pending all around the world against the mandating of vaccines, vaccine passports, vaccination of children and vaccination of the Covid recovered. Criminal cases have also been filed against individual members of governments. However, many courts and some judiciary have been compromised and this is a very slow process, particularly as cases have been deliberately delayed and judges have been intimidated or influenced. We can no longer rely on the justice system to protect us, but we have to hope some parts of it are still functional.
There is so much more than can be said but there is already an enormous amount of information to digest and consider especially if you have not been aware of much of this previously, so I will finish here with a list of sources of further information which it might be helpful to glance over (as they deserve more than mere relegation to the back pages), before concluding:
30. Additional resources and information
This excellent presentation by Nick Hudson of PANDATA is well worth watching at this point to reinforce/add to the above: https://www.pandata.org/time-to-reopen-society/.
Ernst Wolf. Uncovering the Corona narrative, 21 Aug 2021. Author, journalist and expert in matters of the global financial economy, Ernst Wolff gave this speech on 21st Aug at the Growth Earth Peace and Freedom 2021 Congress in Davos (WEFF): https://odysee.com/@LongXXvids:c/Ernst-Wolf-speech---summary:3
Letter from 13 highly respected world leading experts to Sajid David, MHRA, JCVI, CDC, FDA and others: https://twitter.com/Idonotconsent6/status/1433167762768154633/photo/1
30 facts You Need to Know. Your Covid Crib sheet: https://off-guardian.org/2021/09/22/30-facts-you-need-to-know-your-covid-cribsheet/
Denis Rancourt, a highly qualified professor and research scientists who has now lost his position, been censored, and had all his research removed by ResearchGate: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cRUT7PajZr0
Mike Whitney 9.10.21. Will Vaccine-Linked Deaths Rise Sharply this Winter? https://www.unz.com/mwhitney/will-vaccine-linked-deaths-rise-sharply-this-winter/
Dr Richard Fleming, PhD, MD, JD. Cardiologist, Nuclear Cardiologist, Certified in Positron Emission Tomography (PET), Juris Prudence Doctor of Law, Researcher, Inventor, Author: Excellent highly informative detailed technical information that all doctors should watch (this might get taken down so might be worth watching early): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3GzzBD1kJ0g. There have been attempts to smear Dr Fleming by suing him for fraud. For further details and his side of the story please go to his website – noted further on.
Dr Stephanie Seneff PhD, multiple degrees and PhDs from MIT, and Greg Nigh: https://dpbh.nv.gov/uploadedFiles/dpbhnvgov/content/Boards/BOH/Meetings/2021/SENEFF~1.PDF. This is a highly informative and interesting paper, and I would draw readers’ attention to the following list of firsts for these vaccines highlighted on page 1, extracted here, highlighting the experimental nature of these vaccines: