In addition, many early household transmission studies found that transmission within household members was as low as 17% and the case of the Diamond Princess cruise ship showed that only 20% of people became infected despite being confined together for 19 days following identification of the first case This demonstrated that the vast majority of people had some degree of immunity to this virus already prior to 2020 and that most were not susceptible to serious illness. Given that was the case well over a year ago when the virus had not yet had a chance to circulate, it is logical to assume that had no vaccine ever been developed, that percentage of vulnerable people would have fallen from around 20% to negligible levels by now. Like the Amish community, there would effectively be herd immunity in the UK today without a vaccine. The elephant in the room is the reason we have not gained the benefit of this. It is discussed later on. It is clear that healthy immune systems are not good for the vaccine manufacturers’ business model. If immune systems are damaged however, opportunities for vaccination are vastly improved.
7. Modelling used to exaggerate vaccine effectiveness/lives saved and forecast Covid deaths and systematic distortion/misrepresentation of data
Instead of a pandemic of the unvaccinated, the evidence is increasingly showing that it is the very opposite – it is the vaccinated that are becoming seriously ill and dying from Covid. But why should this be? Please read on to find out.
Classifying deaths within 60/28 days of a positive Covid test as a Covid death, regardless of actual cause, ensured that Covid death numbers were inflated. No post-mortems were allowed to determine the true cause. Flu apparently disappeared but was replaced by Covid cases and deaths. The PCR test can be positive for a number of other viruses (as noted earlier). In addition, discharging infected patients to care homes where it is alleged by whistle-blowers that at least some were ‘treated’ inappropriately with Midazolam, which suppresses the respiratory system, and where others did not receive appropriate treatment, only served to ensure a high ‘Covid’ death rate. In the US, doctors were ordered by Dr Fauci to use the patented and expensive Remdesivir - nothing else was reportedly permitted. Remdesivir was shown by previous trials that Dr Fauci should have been aware of (as he was involved in one) to cause kidney toxicity and death. In the US, many doctors noted kidney failure as a cause of death of Covid patients and attributed it to an unusual effect of Covid. A very high proportion of deaths would not have occurred had effective treatments not been suppressed (dealt with further on) and had inappropriate treatment such as these and ventilating at an inappropriate setting not been policy. Most other countries like Germany and Sweden did not have excess deaths in 2020. Once care home deaths, deaths due to lockdown and deaths due to the injections (see later) were excluded, there was little evidence of excess deaths in the UK either. This has been confirmed by the personal testimonies of an experienced undertaker with a sizeable business who reported that he saw no excess deaths, apart from the care home deaths and that autumn/winter of 2020 was unusually quiet. That was, until the rollout of the vaccine programme when deaths noticeably and immediately jumped making him extremely busy. He reports that other undertakers he knew had similar experiences and that he has never seen anything like it before. Perhaps you could ask your local undertakers about their own experience. The US CDC admitted that only 6% of reported Covid deaths were actually caused by Covid.
People who have the injections may or may not be protecting themselves but what they ARE very probably also doing is transmitting very much higher than normal viral loads and putting others around them at greater risk. I am very sorry to say that they should not be under any illusion that they are protecting others. This must be very upsetting news for all the well-intentioned people who were led to believe otherwise by people who should have known better. In order that mistakes do not compound and lead to escalating levels of sickness and damage to health in the coming months everyone needs to understand this.
The reason for discrediting safe and effective drugs was not just because these medicines were out of patent and very cheap, meaning that there was no money to be made. It is also highly relevant that emergency use authorisation of the injections was granted subject to there being no alternative available treatment. It was recently confirmed by the MHRA in response to a Freedom of Information request that the injections are still used under temporary emergency use legislation. As there is no medium/long term safety data and the trials will not be completed until 2023, these vaccines must remain by any definition, experimental.
The three other major suppressors of the immune system, as demonstrated by plenty of solid research, are lack of adequate sleep, poor nutrition and anxiety/stress. These are being considerably worsened by government policies and the media, perversely making people more susceptible to all illnesses. Of course, there are many other factors that also affect immunity, but these are arguably the most important. One might wonder why the Government and our health bodies make no attempt to provide important life-saving information about preventative measures to the public.
The government is encouraging schools to act as vaccination centres, but schools should be aware that any liability for injury may well fall on them and not the government. In my opinion, and that of thousands of scientists, doctors and concerned parents, injecting these toxic gene therapy products which have NO long-term safety data and predictable serious biological effects into children who have zero risk from the virus is an unthinkable crime. Barrister Francis Hoar has submitted a legal challenge on behalf of the Covid 19 Assembly to halt the vaccination programme for children. The government had asked for the case to be struck out, but it remains before the Court as the Hon. Mr Justice Jay accepts there is an arguable case. The Judge also rejected the government's argument that consideration of the case should be limited to how it affects the two claimants, accepting that it is relevant to the wider population. The government is seeking a long timetable and delay, but the Court has given directions that the government submits further response and evidence by 11 October with the Claimants having to 15 October to reply. Those dates have now passed. The skeleton argument submitted to the court is found here.
The way in which these ‘vaccines’ work to stimulate an immune response is by firstly smuggling the reverse engineered artificially generated genetic code (mRNA in the case of Pfizer/Moderna and DNA in the case of AZ/J&J) into our cells, using a lipid nanoparticle (Pfizer/Moderna) or adenovirus ( AZ/J&J) vector to hijack the cell’s protein making factories, the ribosomes, and instruct them to churn out trillions of copies of the coronavirus spike protein. The huge problem hiding in plain sight is that this is the spike protein (with a few modifications in the case of the mRNA injections, including changes designed to make it stick to the outside of cells) that research has shown on its own (without the rest of the virus) in animal models to be responsible for causing the serious pathology and toxicity in a Covid infection, i.e., the actual disease of Covid itself. An “unwise” choice for a vaccine, perhaps, as the toxicity of the spike protein has also been well documented from research going back 18 years as well as from gain of function research at Chapel Hill and Wuhan specifically designed to make the spike protein even more lethal. In particular, a sequence of 12 amino acids known as the furin cleavage site, (so called because the protein can be cleaved in two at this site by the enzyme furin), is highly unlikely to have mutated into being by chance. It is found in none of the dozens of known coronavirus but increases the infectivity of the virus up to 20 times.
It is notable that in stark contrast with the now 10 deaths (one unvaccinated) of people we personally knew (or who are parents of people we know) since introduction of the shots on 8 December 2020, we do not know a single person or anyone who had a relative who died of Covid or even with Covid prior to 8 December 2020. It seems from our own experience, without even looking at the data, that the introduction of the vaccine programme in the UK was followed closely by an increase in deaths. One of these was the very recent wholly unexpected sudden death of a 49-year-old. The post-mortem concluded that he had a heart attack. None of these would have been reported as a vaccine-caused death on the Yellow Card system as no relative suspected a link except in the first care home case when a cluster of 9 deaths occurred shortly after vaccination. This was investigated but it is thought to have been eventually attributed to Covid rather than the recent vaccinations. These anecdotal observations are consistent with there being a very high level of underreporting of adverse events.
No doubt any deaths caused will be blamed on Covid, perpetuating an extremely vicious circle as people call for yet another round of injections and restrictions. Or they may be blamed on something else like the delayed effect of lockdowns. There are even rumours that they may be blamed on a “new virus”, causing mass panic. This warning from an engineer and academic who has worked for 22 years at a major academic teaching hospital in Dublin is not substantiated, but reluctantly, I feel I need to flag this up as a possibility, however incredible and “conspiracy theory” like it might sound because of two things: firstly, the very serious and horrific implications were this actually to occur and secondly, I have confirmed that the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation led GAVI ( formerly the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunisations) has indeed flagged up the Marburg virus on its website claiming that it spreads asymptomatically (which we know is untrue). PCR tests (which as seen in section 2 can “prove” you have almost anything) and vaccines (with untested unverified contents) for this virus have already been produced despite the Marburg virus having rarely produced a problem in the past, with only 16 cases since 2005. It produces haemorrhagic fever and symptoms that mimic the effect of spike protein damage to blood vessels and might therefore be a very convenient scapegoat so I can see some logic there. Should such a terrifying announcement be made, no one should be panicked into getting this new highly dubious sounding vaccine. In fact, if this should happen, under no circumstances should anyone go anywhere near it.
The number of reported vaccine related deaths in 8 months is 4x greater than those reported for all vaccines in the UK for the past 20 years. WHO data shows 8 x the rate of deaths from the Covid vaccines in 9 months as from all influenza vaccines in 52 years.